Case 1402507/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gower v British Ceramic Tile Ltd ( In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402507/2021
- Decision date
- 7 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gower
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judge-alone judgment in which Employment Judge Rayner struck out Mr D Gower's claim against British Ceramic Tile Ltd (In Administration). The judgment records that, by a letter dated 13 October 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations in writing or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 13 October 2023 gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.