Case 1402511/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Turner v IM Bristol Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402511/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Turner brought claims against IM Bristol Limited for unpaid wages, notice pay after summary dismissal, and failure to provide contractual documentation. The respondent said part of the wages had been withheld because he had taken more holiday than he was entitled to, but the tribunal found there was no written agreement allowing such a deduction. On the evidence accepted from Mr Turner, the net amount due for the work performed was £1,047 and, after £462 had been paid, the balance awarded for unlawful deduction from wages was £585.
The tribunal also found that Mr Turner had been dismissed without notice and that there was no question of gross misconduct. He was therefore entitled to one week's notice, calculated on 35 hours at £8.25 per hour, giving gross notice pay of £288.75 and a net award of £264. The tribunal further accepted his evidence that he had not received a contract of employment and awarded two weeks' pay of £577.50 in relation to that claim.
The respondent's employer's claim or counterclaim, said to arise from alleged loss caused by the claimant's lateness, was dismissed. The respondent did not attend the hearing and was unable to establish that claim. The judgment records no discrimination issues and does not identify any legal test by name.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that a deduction had been made from wages for holiday taken beyond entitlement, but there was no written agreement permitting that deduction. | Upheld | — | £585 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was dismissed without notice and, as there was no gross misconduct, the tribunal held he was entitled to one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £264 |
| Other | The tribunal accepted that the claimant had not received a contract of employment and awarded two weeks' pay. The judgment did not give a separate statutory label for this claim. | Upheld | — | £578 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's employer's claim/counterclaim, based on alleged loss from the claimant's lateness, was dismissed because the respondent did not attend and could not establish it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,427
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.