Case 1402517/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Goddard v 1) Vuzix Corporation 2) Vuzix Europe GmbH — 2025
- Case reference
- 1402517/2025
- Decision date
- 1 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Goddard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns Mr S Goddard's application for interim relief against Vuzix Corporation and Vuzix Europe GmbH, heard at Southampton on 5 November 2025 before Employment Judge Dawson. The record identifies the claimant as representing himself and the respondent as represented by counsel.
The order records only that the application for interim relief was dismissed. No separate award, split award, or monetary relief is recorded in the written decision.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further findings of fact or legal reasoning are set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief dismissed; the written record does not set out any substantive reasons beyond recording that reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.