Case 1402524/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Loveridge v Southampton Primary Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402524/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Loveridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Loveridge brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Southampton Primary Care Limited. Employment Judge Bax held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years' service before an unfair dismissal complaint can be brought, and that the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
On that basis, the tribunal found that she was not entitled to bring the complaint. It also recorded that she had been given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but she did not provide an acceptable reason. The unfair dismissal complaint was therefore struck out. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant had less than two years' service, so she was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 ERA 1996. She was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not give an acceptable reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.