Case 1402539/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Leslie (1) Ms D Hanson (2) v Aquan Water, F.A.O. Alex Ling — 2025
- Case reference
- 1402539/2024
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Leslie (1) Ms D Hanson (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the linked claims brought by Mr D Leslie and Ms D Hanson against Aquan Water, FAO Alex Ling. By letter dated 12 September 2025, it gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Dawson therefore struck out the claims. The judgment records no findings on the underlying merits of the claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment covers case numbers 1402539/2024 and 1400074/2025 together. By letter dated 12 September 2025, the tribunal invited the claimants to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. No sufficient representations were made and no hearing was requested, so the claims were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.