Case 1402552/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Freeman v Lillybrook Estate Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1402552/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms S Maidment, Mrs J Cook
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Freeman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol on 27 to 29 November 2023, Employment Judge Midgley with Ms S Maidment and Mrs J Cook heard Mr J Freeman's claims against Lillybrook Estate Ltd. The written judgment records that the respondent conceded the claimant's claim for unpaid annual leave, and the parties reached terms of settlement for the annual leave sums owed in the amount of £560.69.
The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay Mr Freeman £560.69 for unpaid annual leave. No separate remedy breakdown was given for that sum, and the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons provided.
The tribunal dismissed the claims for unfair dismissal, direct discrimination on the grounds of age, direct discrimination on the grounds of disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The judgment states that those claims were not well founded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent conceded that the claimant's unpaid annual leave claim was well founded, and the parties reached settlement terms in the sum of £560.69. | Settled | — | £561 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment describes this as direct discrimination on the grounds of age. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment also records a failure to make reasonable adjustments, which was dismissed together with the disability discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | Failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed; this is recorded here as an additional non-enum claim type because the schema does not include a specific reasonable-adjustments category. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £561
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.