Case 1402556/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N K Keeling v Xlss — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402556/2021
- Decision date
- 24 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N K Keeling
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. On 31 December 2021, the tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing in response to the suggestion that the unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make any, or any sufficient, written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
No monetary remedy was awarded or discussed in the judgment. The decision was signed by Employment Judge Livesey on 21 January 2022 and sent to the parties on 24 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 31 December 2021 to make representations or request a hearing on the proposal to strike out the unfair dismissal complaint for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, so the complaint was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.