Case 1402560/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Kayleigh Turner v Transforming Futures Multi-Academy Trust Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402560/2022
- Decision date
- 28 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Panel members
- Mr R Spry-Shute, Mr K Sleeth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Kayleigh Turner
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol by video on 11 and 12 September 2023 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke, sitting with Mr R Spry-Shute and Mr K Sleeth. The claimant, Miss Kayleigh Turner, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal’s written judgment states that the claimant’s claims of automatic unfair dismissal on grounds of pregnancy and direct pregnancy discrimination both failed and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
The written record also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a claim for automatic unfair dismissal on grounds of pregnancy; it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records a claim for direct pregnancy discrimination; it was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.