Case 1402572/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Moores Respondent (1): Appoint Personnel Limited Respondent (2): Chantelle Clarke Respondent (3): Europa Management Group Ltd Respondent (4): Tyler Hamilton Heard by Video Hearing v Appoint Personnel Ltd and Others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402572/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Moores Respondent (1): Appoint Personnel Limited Respondent (2): Chantelle Clarke Respondent (3): Europa Management Group Ltd Respondent (4): Tyler Hamilton Heard by Video Hearing
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 28 October 2022, Employment Judge A Frazer heard the claim by video. The Respondents did not attend and did not enter a response. The Tribunal found that they had been appropriately served, and judgment was therefore entered in default under Rule 21.
The Tribunal awarded £7,680.14 for failure to inform and consult against Respondents 1 and 3 jointly and severally. It also awarded £12,150.82 for detriment contrary to s.44 ERA 1996 against Respondents 2, 3 and 4 jointly and severally. Against Respondent 3, the Tribunal awarded a basic award of £6,256.00 and a compensatory award of £19,585.41 for unfair dismissal, £3,772.71 for unlawful deductions from wages, £700.00 for breach of contract, and a grossing-up award of £3,976.61. The grand total against Respondent 3 was £54,121.69.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Failure to inform and consult; award made jointly and severally against Respondents 1 and 3. | Upheld | — | £7,680 |
| Other | Detriment contrary to s.44 ERA 1996; award made jointly and severally against Respondents 2, 3 and 4. | Upheld | — | £12,151 |
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded against Respondent 3: basic award £6,256.00 and compensatory award £19,585.41. | Upheld | — | £25,841 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded against Respondent 3. | Upheld | — | £3,773 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded against Respondent 3. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £54,122
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,256
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £19,585
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.