Case 1402574/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Nobes v Fowler Welch Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402574/2022
- Decision date
- 13 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Panel members
- Mrs S Collins, Mr C Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Nobes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Southampton on 23 October 2023 before Employment Judge Self, Mrs S Collins and Mr C Williams, the respondent applied to strike out the claimant's claim under Rule 37(1)(c) and Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal held that the application under Rule 37(1)(c) was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal then found that the application under Rule 37(1)(a) was well-founded and succeeded. As a result, all claims were dismissed. The respondent's application for costs was also dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying substantive claim type or any merits findings beyond the strike-out orders.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The respondent's application under Rule 37(1)(a) succeeded and all claims were dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(a)
- Rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.