Case 1402581/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Keating in person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402581/2020
- Decision date
- 22 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Keating in person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Thomas Keating's unfair dismissal claim against GreenThumb Ltd at Bristol by Cloud Video Platform on 14 and 15 January 2021. The hearing was remote by consent. Employment Judge Street presided, with Mr Keating appearing in person and Ms A Niaz-Dickinson appearing for the respondent.
The only substantive decision recorded in the judgment is that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out any factual findings, legal analysis, or remedy calculation in the extracted text provided.
The tribunal also dismissed the respondent's application for costs. The judgment was given orally, with written reasons to follow only if requested within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. The separate application for costs was also dismissed, but it is not a claim type in the extraction schema. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.