Case 1402588/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Attwell v AND A J Edwards & Son — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402588/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Attwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case in chambers on 23 January 2023 under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. It therefore entered judgment without a contested hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 24 March 2023.
The tribunal held that the claimant, Mr M Attwell, was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £5,712.00. The figure was calculated in the judgment as 7 weeks x 1.5 at £544.00 gross per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded and ordered the respondent, A J Edwards & Son, to pay six weeks’ notice pay of £3,600.00. In addition, the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded, with an award of £840.00 for 7 days’ pay. The total of the sums awarded in the judgment was £10,152.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £5,712.00, calculated as 7 weeks x 1.5 at £544.00 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £5,712 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim succeeded and ordered six weeks' notice pay of £3,600.00. | Upheld | — | £3,600 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded and ordered payment of £840.00 for 7 days' pay. | Upheld | — | £840 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,152
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.