Case 1402589/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gossling v AET Transport Services Trading As Eaton Transport — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402589/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gossling
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 November 2020, the tribunal told Mr A Gossling that his claim might be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and gave him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. No substantive merits findings are recorded in this judgment, and the hearing fixed for 4-5 March 2020 was not to take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37 because the claim had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 18 November 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing; the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The extracted text does not specify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.