Case 1402600/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Xena v Karrek Community CIC — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402600/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Xena
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss A Xena's complaint of discrimination on the ground of disability. In a letter dated 21 March 2023, the tribunal had given her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the order of 2 February 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The reasons record that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the disability discrimination complaint.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claim was still listed for hearing on 27 April 2023. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint of discrimination on the ground of disability after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's letter of 21 March 2023. The reasons recorded that the claim had not complied with the order dated 2 February 2023 and had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.