Case 1402612/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Reed v Ston Easton Ltd (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402612/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs A Morgan and Miss V Reed brought proceedings against Ston Easton Limited (in administration) under case numbers 1402612/2020 and 1402673/2020. Employment Judge Cadney signed the decision on 11 August 2020 and stated that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the dispute, no identified legal test, and no monetary award. It is a short withdrawal judgment only, so the record is limited to the fact of withdrawal and dismissal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimants. The short judgment does not separately describe the pleaded claim; claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimants. The short judgment does not separately describe the pleaded claim; claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.