Case 1402618/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Laurentiu Florea v Epicuria London Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402618/2020
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Laurentiu Florea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Laurentiu Florea, brought a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against Epicuria London Limited. The case was heard at Bristol by Cloud Video Platform on 14 January 2021 before Employment Judge Bax, with Mr Florea appearing in person and Mr Gasparro appearing for the respondent.
The tribunal held that the complaint was well founded. It found that there had been an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £657.53.
Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons is recorded in the judgment. The written record therefore records the outcome and the award, but does not set out further factual or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaint well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £657.53. | Upheld | — | £658 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £658
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.