Case 1402619/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Roberts v Infiled E M International Ltd By: CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402619/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 10 December 2021, Employment Judge Craft considered whether Mrs S Roberts was disabled at the relevant time for the purposes of s.6(2) of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that she was not disabled within that provision.
On that basis, the claimant's claims that Infiled E M International Ltd discriminated against her by reason of disability were dismissed. The judgment records that the claimant had married and that her name was amended accordingly.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's remaining claims would be considered at a further hearing listed to commence on 6 June 2022, with directions already having been given. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Determined at a preliminary hearing on 10 December 2021. The tribunal found the claimant was not disabled at the relevant time within s.6(2) Equality Act 2010, so the disability discrimination claims were dismissed. The remaining claims were listed for a later hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6(2) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.