Case 1402633/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Clarke v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2024
- Case reference
- 1402633/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Ms Lloyd-Jennings, Mr Wakeman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat at Southampton from 11 to 15 December 2023 before Employment Judge Gray with members Ms Lloyd-Jennings and Mr Wakeman. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The unanimous judgment recorded that the claimant's complaints of indirect disability discrimination, failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments, and discrimination arising from disability all failed and were dismissed. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint described in the judgment as indirect disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint described in the judgment as failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint described in the judgment as discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.