Case 1402635/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Davies v Prestige Windows Bristol Ltd (In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402635/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R. Harper MBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Davies
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr C Davies's claim against Prestige Windows Bristol Ltd (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) under rule 37. The reasons record that by a letter dated 17 October 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R. Harper MBE stated that the claim was struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type; the case was struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.