Case 1402650/2022 · Employment Tribunal
1402650/2022 Adams 1402792/2022 Dyball 1402796/2022 Fox 1402800/2022 Granger 1402724/2022 Lynes 1402730/2022 Moulsdale 1402715/2022 Peszleg 1402748/2022 Sion 1402809/2022 Head v Sodexo Ltd CORRECTED — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402650/2022
- Decision date
- 3 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1402650/2022 Adams 1402792/2022 Dyball 1402796/2022 Fox 1402800/2022 Granger 1402724/2022 Lynes 1402730/2022 Moulsdale 1402715/2022 Peszleg 1402748/2022 Sion 1402809/2022 Head
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 5 December 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability, any findings on the underlying claim type, or any monetary award. The decision is a procedural strike-out only, dated 3 April 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause(s) of action; it only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.