Case 1402653/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Oversby v GKN Aerospace Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402653/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Oversby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was age discrimination by Mr S Oversby against GKN Aerospace Services Ltd. A preliminary hearing on 28 January 2020 resulted in an order that the claimant pay a deposit of £100.00.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to pay the deposit. On that basis, the complaint of age discrimination was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £100 following a preliminary hearing on 28 January 2020, but did not pay it. The age discrimination complaint was therefore struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.