Case 1402656/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Blamey v Jenkins Stone Company Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1402656/2024
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Blamey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented at the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 6 November 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Self determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made on the claim or part of it without a hearing.
The Tribunal found in the claimant's favour on four distinct heads. It held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages (£4,377.00 gross); that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £433.00; that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,745.00; and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, awarded at £2,120.00.
The judgment directs the respondent to pay the claimant £15,675 in total. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Self on 7 July 2025 and sent to the parties on 9 July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; award stated as £4,377.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,377 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £433.00. | Upheld | — | £433 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,745.00. | Upheld | — | £8,745 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; award of £2,120.00. Layer 1 listing referenced Working Time Regulations; the judgment characterises the award as holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,675
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.