Case 1402658/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Khan Morris Accountants Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402658/2020
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Exeter by video on 30 April 2021, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent, Employment Judge Smail recorded that the respondent owed the claimant £530.01 for a shortfall of net salary for April 2020 and £461.55 in holiday pay. The judgment does not set out separate reasons for those sums and records them as amounts owed to the claimant.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent owed £10,061.57 in contractual notice pay and £4,304 as a redundancy payment, described as 8 whole years at £538. The total amount ordered to be paid immediately was £15,357.13.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Shortfall of net salary for April 2020; the judgment does not state a more specific legal label for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £530 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay awarded in the sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £462 |
| Breach of contract | Contractual notice pay awarded in the sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,062 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded as 8 whole years x £538. | Upheld | — | £4,304 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,357
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.