Case 1402663/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Whittaker v Arrios Utilities Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402663/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Whittaker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Emerton struck out Mrs C Whittaker's claim against Arrios Utilities Ltd under rule 37. The tribunal's reason stated that by a letter dated 21 September 2019 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 15 August 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. The judgment is dated 4 October 2019 and was sent to the parties on 8 October 2019. No merits determination or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. The underlying case listing identified breach of contract, but the reasons do not separately analyse it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. The underlying case listing identified unlawful deduction from wages, but the reasons do not separately analyse it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.