Mr S Davies v Glam Security Ltd — 2019

Case reference: 1402671/2019
Decision date: 24 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Reed
Venue: Bristol

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Davies

Respondent

Glam Security Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 11 October 2019 at Bristol, Employment Judge Reed sat alone. The claimant, Mr S Davies, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the respondent failed to make a payment to the claimant representing holiday accrued and untaken, and the tribunal directed payment of £2,355.13.

The judgment also records that the respondent failed to supply the claimant with a statement of principal terms of employment, and the tribunal directed payment of £1,050. The decision contains no further findings or reasoning beyond those two monetary orders.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	The judgment states that the respondent failed to make a payment to the claimant representing holiday accrued and untaken and directs payment of £2,355.13.	Upheld	—	£2,355
Breach of contract	The judgment states that the respondent failed to supply the claimant with a statement of principal terms of employment and directs payment of £1,050. The judgment gives no further reasoning or legal basis beyond that order.	Upheld	—	£1,050

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £3,405; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.