Case 1402680/2019 · Employment Tribunal
- MR S DAVENPORT (C2) FOR THE v - Ms K Zakrzewska — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402680/2019
- Decision date
- 20 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms Y Ramsaran, Mr H Patel
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- MR S DAVENPORT (C2) FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Cardiff on 20 February 2020, gave a unanimous judgment in favour of the claimants in part. For the first claimant, Mrs Rebecca Davenport, the tribunal upheld claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal (notice pay). It dismissed her claim of sex discrimination and/or marital status discrimination.
For the second claimant, Mr Stephen Davenport, the tribunal upheld claims of unlawful deduction from wages and unpaid holiday pay. The extracted judgment does not set out the tribunal's detailed factual reasoning beyond recording those outcomes.
Remedy was awarded separately for each claimant. Mrs Davenport was awarded a basic award of £1,938.44, compensatory award of £3,876.88, and £1,384.60 for wrongful dismissal, producing a total of £7,199.92. Mr Davenport was awarded £486.00 for unlawful deduction from wages and £1,260.00 for unpaid holiday pay, producing a total of £1,746.00.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | First claimant. Tribunal upheld unfair dismissal and awarded a basic award of £1,938.44. | Upheld | — | £1,938 |
| Wrongful dismissal | First claimant. Described in the judgment as wrongful dismissal (notice pay); awarded £1,384.60. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
| Sex discrimination | First claimant. The judgment stated the claim as 'sex discrimination and/or marital status discrimination'; it was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant. Claim for unlawful deduction from wages was upheld; award £486.00. | Upheld | — | £486 |
| Holiday pay | Second claimant. Claim for unpaid holiday pay was upheld; award £1,260.00. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,946
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,938
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,877
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.