Case 1402711/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Maria-Jacqueline Garcia-Diaz v Mr A Desai and Mr M Desai and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402711/2021
- Decision date
- 31 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Withers Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss Maria-Jacqueline Garcia-Diaz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol video hearing on 10 August 2022, Employment Judge Withers held that Miss Maria-Jacqueline Garcia-Diaz was an employee of the second respondent, Cedar Care Homes Ltd. The judgment records that the claimant’s claims against the first and third respondents, Mr A Desai and Mr M Desai and Barker Care Ltd, were dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s claims for unauthorised deductions from wages against the second respondent were not well founded and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy figures are identified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant was an employee of the second respondent, dismissed the claims against the first and third respondents, and found that the unauthorised deductions from wages claims against the second respondent were not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.