Case 1402715/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person (assisted by a Court provided interpreter) For the v Mr A Ferreira — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402715/2020
- Decision date
- 21 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (assisted by a Court provided interpreter) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a judgment by consent on 17 February 2022. It noted that the First Claimant, Mrs Wroblewska, was owed wages of £495.13 gross, calculated as 58.25 hours at £8.50 per hour, and holiday pay of £510 gross, calculated as 60 hours at £8.50 per hour. The Respondent was ordered to pay both sums.
The tribunal also recorded that the Second Claimant, Mr Swierczek, was owed wages of £657 gross, calculated as 54.75 hours at £12 per hour. The Respondent was ordered to pay that sum. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal recorded that the First Claimant was owed wages for 58.25 hours at £8.50 per hour and ordered the Respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £495 |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the tribunal recorded that the First Claimant was owed holiday pay for 60 hours at £8.50 per hour and ordered the Respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £510 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal recorded that the Second Claimant was owed wages for 54.75 hours at £12 per hour and ordered the Respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £657 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,662
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.