Case 1402716/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the First v Written Submissions For the Second Respondent: Written Submissions — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402716/2019
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Bodmin on 18 May 2022 held that the claimant, Mr Jeremy Thomas, was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. The judgment records the amount as £3,825.00, calculated as 6 x 1.5 at £425.00 gross per week.
The tribunal also held that the claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of his six weeks' notice period. The claimant gave credit for alternative earnings received for one week, and the second respondent was ordered to pay five weeks' net pay in the sum of £1,925.00.
No other substantive claims or legal tests are identified in the extracted judgment text, and the total of the two monetary awards is £5,750.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,825.00, calculated as 6 x 1.5 at £425.00 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £3,825 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of the claimant's six weeks' notice period. The claimant gave credit for alternative earnings received for one week, and the second respondent was ordered to pay five weeks' net pay in the sum of £1,925.00. | Upheld | — | £1,925 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.