Case 1402720/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Forsyth v Home Office — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402720/2020
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Forsyth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the Respondent's application for costs at Southampton on 6 January 2022 before Employment Judge Self sitting alone.
The tribunal found that the Respondent's costs application pursuant to Rule 76(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was not well-founded and dismissed it. The judgment does not determine the underlying unfair dismissal, whistleblowing, or health and safety claims, and it makes no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The only matter adjudicated in this judgment was the Respondent's application for costs under Rule 76(1)(a), (b) and (c), which does not map to a more specific claim_type enum. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 76(1)(a) Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 76(1)(b) Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 76(1)(c) Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.