Case 1402729/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J W Greenaway v Securist Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402729/2019
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J W Greenaway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the parties reached terms of agreement and that the claim was heard at Bristol on 29 November 2019 before Employment Judge Midgley. It states that the claims were to be dismissed on their deemed withdrawal by the claimant unless either party applied to restore them by 10 December 2019.
The written record then states that no application to restore was made by that date, so the claims were dismissed on their deemed withdrawal. The judgment does not set out any merits findings, legal analysis, or monetary award, and it notes that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing categories; the written judgment itself records only that the claims were dismissed on deemed withdrawal after the claimant did not apply to restore them by 10 December 2019. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing categories; the written judgment itself records only that the claims were dismissed on deemed withdrawal after the claimant did not apply to restore them by 10 December 2019. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.