Case 1402741/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P L Apostol v Rehoboth Health and Home Care Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402741/2021
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P L Apostol
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 3 August 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Midgley Date made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the material provided.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's holiday pay complaint. It found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,520 gross. The footnote to the judgment shows the figure was calculated as (£10.5 x 60) x 4.
The tribunal also upheld the complaint that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. It ordered payment of two weeks' gross pay, recorded in the judgment as £1,088.00. The footnote states that the statutory cap of £544 was applied, producing an award of £1,088. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £3,608.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,520 gross. The footnote calculates this as (£10.5 x 60) x 4. | Upheld | — | £2,520 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars and ordered payment of two weeks' gross pay. The footnote states that the statutory cap of £544 applied, so the award was £1,088. | Upheld | — | £1,088 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,608
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.