Case 1402748/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A van der Lugt v Kung Fu Fareham Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402748/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A van der Lugt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent, Kung Fu Fareham Ltd (in liquidation), was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out.
The tribunal also noted that on 12 October 2021 it had given the claimant 7 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for having not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The claim was therefore struck out. No merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action; it records only that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation without court permission and because the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being asked to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.