Case 1402757/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Ms Lundy, HR — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402757/2021
- Decision date
- 8 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Exeter by video on 24 March 2022 before Employment Judge Smail, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms Lundy, HR. The judgment first extended time for presentation of the response.
The claim was then struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success under any statutory cause of action justiciable in the Tribunal. The written reasons do not identify a specific legal claim type, and no liability findings were made on the merits.
The judge recorded Ms Lundy’s confirmation that the claimant was not blacklisted from applying for employment with the respondent in the future. No financial remedy was awarded. Judgment was sent to the parties on 8 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a specific statutory claim type; it states that the claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success under any statutory cause of action justiciable in the Tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.