Case 1402758/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jon Carthy v Landmarc Support Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402758/2020
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millard Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jon Carthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Bristol by CVP on 1 October 2021 before Employment Judge Millard. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr Jon Carthy, was represented in person and the respondent, Landmarc Support Services Ltd, was represented by Mr David Jones.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the claimant’s claim for breach of contract was dismissed. No further factual findings, legal reasoning, or monetary award are set out in the written record supplied.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time by either party. On the extracted text provided, no further detail is available about the basis for dismissal or any separate remedy determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.