Case 1402764/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen Nicholas v 3R Global Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402764/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen Nicholas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on a preliminary issue heard at Bristol by video on 14 May 2021 before Employment Judge Fowell. The claimant was Mr Stephen Nicholas and the respondent was 3R Global Limited. The tribunal held that the claim had been presented out of time and dismissed it on that basis.
The tribunal also stated that, in any event, there was no unlawful deduction from wages or breach of contract. No monetary award was made and no remedy calculation was recorded. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no further written reasons were requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was presented out of time and dismissed on that preliminary basis. The tribunal added that, in any event, there was no unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was presented out of time and dismissed on that preliminary basis. The tribunal added that, in any event, there was no breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.