Case 1402767/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Eggleton v Marks and Spencer plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402767/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Eggleton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a withdrawal judgment. It records that the claimant withdrew the claim and that the proceedings were dismissed following that withdrawal.
The judgment does not set out findings on the merits of the claim, reasons for withdrawal, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give reasons or adjudicate the merits. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific claim type is taken from the listing category rather than the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific claim type is taken from the listing category rather than the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific claim type is taken from the listing category rather than the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.