Case 1402770/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Miss R Thomas — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402770/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 14 and 15 December 2020 before Employment Judge Rayner sitting alone, the tribunal dealt with three linked claim numbers. It struck out claim number 1405429/2020 in its entirety because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. It also dismissed the respondent's application to strike out claim number 1401725/2020 and its application for a deposit order in respect of that claim.
The tribunal did not determine the underlying merits of the remaining claims in this judgment. It recorded that the remaining claims would proceed to a full liability and remedy hearing listed for 10 days in January 2022. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim number 1405429/2020 was struck out in its entirety on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.