Case 1402773/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Aniagwu, Consultant For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402773/2020
- Decision date
- 24 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr O Aniagwu, Consultant For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote hearing on 28 October 2021 before Employment Judge N J Roper, the tribunal dealt with three claims in this judgment. The claimant's claims for entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment and for accrued but unpaid holiday pay were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that this disposal did not affect the claimant's remaining unfair dismissal claim, which was being dealt with separately in the Case Management Summary of the same date.
No monetary award is recorded in this judgment, and no remedy was assessed or split between the disposed claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.