Case 1402777/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Menezes (1) Miss E Mallon (2) v PSTNBristol Limited t/a Pastan — 2025
- Case reference
- 1402777/2024
- Decision date
- 23 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Menezes (1) Miss E Mallon (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal declared that both claimants, Miss J Menezes and Miss E Mallon, had suffered unlawful deductions from their wages and had not been paid accrued holiday pay on termination by the respondent, PSTNBristol Limited t/a Pastan. The respondent entered no response and did not attend the hearing, which was conducted by CVP before Employment Judge Self on 23 May 2025.
Miss J Menezes was awarded £2,064 for unpaid wages and £482.08 for unpaid accrued holiday pay, a total of £2,546.08. Miss E Mallon was awarded £504 for unpaid wages and £60.83 for unpaid accrued holiday pay, a total of £564.83. Both claimants appeared in person.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Combined unpaid wages awarded to both claimants: £2,064 (Miss J Menezes) + £504 (Miss E Mallon). This case is consolidated with 1402778/2024. | Upheld | — | £2,568 |
| Holiday pay | Combined unpaid accrued holiday pay awarded on termination: £482.08 (Miss J Menezes) + £60.83 (Miss E Mallon). This case is consolidated with 1402778/2024. | Upheld | — | £543 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,111
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.