Case 1402783/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M v I Rosewarne AND Coyco Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402783/2019
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 15 August 2019. The respondent indicated that it did not dispute the claims, and judgment was therefore entered under Rule 21.
The claimant succeeded on his claim for unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Coyco Limited, to pay the claimant the gross sum of £387.50.
The claimant also succeeded on his claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £118.81. The judgment records no separate award components beyond those two gross sums, giving a total of £506.31.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent indicated that it did not dispute the claim. The tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £387.50. | Upheld | — | £388 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent indicated that it did not dispute the claim. The tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £118.81 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £119 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £506
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.