Case 1402793/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Darryl Moore v Sunseeker International Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402793/2018
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr Evans, Mr Richardson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Darryl Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously held that Sunseeker International Limited discriminated against Mr Darryl Moore by failing to make reasonable adjustments in relation to his employment between 26 February 2018 and 16 March 2018. That was the only substantive claim recorded as successful in the judgment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,253.33, described as compensation for injury to feelings and stated to be inclusive of interest. The judgment does not break that figure down further, so no separate interest amount is identified in the extracted text.
All other claims were dismissed. The judgment is brief and does not set out further factual findings, legal analysis, or a separate remedies breakdown beyond the single award noted above.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found a failure to make reasonable adjustments between 26 February 2018 and 16 March 2018. The award was stated to be in respect of injury to feelings, inclusive of interest; no separate interest figure was given. | Upheld | Disability | £2,253 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,253
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.