Case 1402793/2019 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402793/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol hearing on 20 November 2019, before Employment Judge Cadney, the judgment records that the parties had reached agreement. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying breach of contract or working time issues.
The tribunal ordered that the case be adjourned generally and stated that it would be dismissed on deemed withdrawal by the claimant unless either party applied in writing to restore the case for hearing by 4.00pm on 15 January 2020. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the parties had reached agreement. The case was adjourned generally and would be dismissed on deemed withdrawal unless either party applied in writing to restore it by 4.00pm on 15 January 2020. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the parties had reached agreement. The case was adjourned generally and would be dismissed on deemed withdrawal unless either party applied in writing to restore it by 4.00pm on 15 January 2020. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.