Case 1402806/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Stafford v Gracelands Ltd. — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402806/2021
- Decision date
- 21 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Le Grys
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Stafford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Stafford brought a claim against Gracelands Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages and a separate claim concerning the failure to provide written particulars of employment. Sitting at Bristol by video on 10 June 2022, Employment Judge Le Grys dismissed the unauthorised deduction claim as not well founded.
The tribunal found that the claim about written particulars of employment was well founded, but it awarded no compensation. The written record states that the Tribunal had no power to make a compensation award in light of the dismissal of the unauthorised deduction claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim that the Respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment was found well founded, but no compensation was awarded because the Tribunal said it had no power to do so in light of the dismissal of the unauthorised deduction claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.