Case 1402810/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Henry, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402810/2019
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr N Henry, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at London Central, before Employment Judge Mr J Tayler, recorded on 18 December 2019 that the claim was struck out. The short written record identifies the parties as Mr AA Oyenuga and the Ministry of Defence and notes that the decision was sent to the parties on 19 December 2019.
No written reasons were provided in the record supplied. The document states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text does not set out the basis for the strike-out decision or any findings on the underlying issues.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text only states that 'The Claim is struck out'; the breach of contract category is taken from the case listing supplied in the task context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text only states that 'The Claim is struck out'; the race discrimination category is taken from the case listing supplied in the task context. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.