Case 1402816/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Touch v Stroud Care Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402816/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Touch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only substantive disposal recorded in the extracted judgment is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment is dated 16 January 2020 and is signed by Employment Judge Livesey.
No findings of fact or law on the underlying merits are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded. The extract also does not break the withdrawal down by individual pleaded issue, so the underlying claim categories have been taken from the case listing information rather than from a merits decision in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extract does not separately identify the individual pleaded claims, but the case listing categories were breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extract does not separately identify the individual pleaded claims, but the case listing categories were breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.