Case 1402820/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J R Torres Del Rio v BF Corporation UK Branch Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402820/2021
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J R Torres Del Rio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on 28 October 2022, Employment Judge Youngs heard the Claimant’s claims against BF Corporation UK Branch Ltd, which did not attend. The judgment records that the Claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions succeeded and that the Respondent was ordered to pay £1,384.60 gross.
The Claimant’s breach of contract claim also succeeded. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £390.00 by way of unpaid expenses. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the judgment itself contains only the outcome and the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £1,384.60 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £390.00 by way of unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,775
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.