Case 1402829/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richard Gasser Respondent 1: The Governing Body of Stonehouse Park Federation Respondent 2: Gloucestershire County Council v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402829/2021
- Decision date
- 21 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Le Grys
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Richard Gasser Respondent 1: The Governing Body of Stonehouse Park Federation Respondent 2: Gloucestershire County Council
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bristol by CVP on 6, 7 and 8 March 2023 before Employment Judge Le Grys. The written judgment records appearances for the claimant and both respondents, and identifies the parties as Mr Richard Gasser, the Governing Body of Stonehouse Park Federation, and Gloucestershire County Council.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the claim was not well founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the record supplied here. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written record states that the claim was not well founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the record supplied here. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.