Case 1402831/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Not in attendance, or represented — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402831/2021
- Decision date
- 17 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 3 December 2021, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend or take part. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and had failed to pay arrears of holiday pay. Those sums were assessed together, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £673.90 in total.
The judgment also deals with the claimant's claim for failure to consult in respect of a TUPE transfer. That claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The written record does not set out any separate breakdown between the wage deduction and holiday pay elements, and no further remedy was recorded beyond the total award of £673.90.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages and included this in the aggregate award of £673.90; no separate figure was set out for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found arrears of holiday pay were unpaid and included this in the aggregate award of £673.90; no separate figure was set out for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment records the TUPE consultation claim as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £674
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.