Case 1402833/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Todorova v Amazon Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402833/2022
- Decision date
- 8 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss P Todorova
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss P Todorova's complaint of unfair dismissal against Amazon UK and Addeco. The judgment records that the complaint was brought under case numbers 1402833/2022 and 1402834/2022.
The reason for strike out was that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and the tribunal found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years. The judgment also records that the claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but had not given an acceptable reason.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment. The tribunal stated that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment, so only the unfair dismissal complaint is treated as adjudicated here. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.